There are many fields that we need to invest in, but
unfortunately, the money we have is limited.When one carefully considers the cost-benefit analysis, one sees that
spending money on the public transportation is the best choice.
To begin with, we already have an easy access to the
internet regardless of time and space. It is often said that the internet is
one of the most important instruments in this rapidly changing society.However, many private companies have already been
conducive to dispersing the internet.Because
there are tremendous kinds of high-speed internet services that are being provided
at cheap prices, almost every household can easily access the internet,
nowadays.According to the research by
Seoul National University in 2008, about 80 percent of families in Korea were
using the high-speed internet service. Therefore, spending more money on
enhancing public access to the internet is no less than just a wasteing
of money because the
majority of people have access to it.
In additionSecondly, improving public transportation can
reduce the significant costs of recovering the environment.It is obvious that a
destroyed environment leads to spending huge amounts of money to recover
it.However, using more public
transportation would help prevent the destruction of the environment.Thus, spending money on improving public
transportation has an effect samethe same effect as earning a lot of money by
decreasing recovery costs. The research
of the Ministry of Environment of Korea in 2010 showsed that adopting the
natural gas fueled-driven
public buses has reduced aboutapproximately 3 million dollars, which is needed
to recoverreduce
global warming.So, spending more money
on making better a public
transportation system is not an option but an obligation.
All things considered (summarize two points), weGovernments have to
spend more money on improving public transportation rather than on the
internet.
There are many fields that we need to invest in, but unfortunately, the money we have is limited. When one carefully considers the cost-benefit analysis, one sees that spending money on the public transportation is the best choice.
To begin with, we already have an easy access to the internet regardless of time and space. It is often said that the internet is one of the most important instruments in this rapidly changing society. However, many private companies have already been conducive to dispersing the internet. Because there are tremendous kinds of high-speed internet services that are being provided at cheap prices, almost every household can easily access the internet, nowadays. According to the research by Seoul National University in 2008, about 80 percent of families in Korea were using the high-speed internet service. Therefore, spending more money on enhancing public access to the internet is
no less than justa wasteingof money because the majority of people have access to it.In additionSecondly, improving public transportation can reduce the significant costs of recovering the environment. It is obvious that a destroyed environment leads to spending huge amounts of money to recover it. However, using more public transportation would help prevent the destruction of the environment. Thus, spending money on improving public transportation hasan effect samethe same effect as earning a lot of money by decreasing recovery costs. The research of the Ministry of Environment of Korea in 2010 showsed that adopting the natural gasfueled-driven public buses has reducedaboutapproximately 3 million dollars, which is needed torecoverreduce global warming. So, spending more money on making better a public transportation system is not an option but an obligation.All things considered(summarize two points),weGovernments have to spend more money on improving public transportation rather than on the internet.