Both the passage and the lecture discuss spanking. While the passage says that spanking is an effective disciplinary tool, the lecture says that spanking is a not good disciplinary method for children.

First of all, the passage states that spanking helps children understand the difference between right and wrong. The passage says that spanking makes children remember what the particular forbidden acts are. The lecture refutes the passage’s statement by saying that spanking does not teach children morality. The lecture also says that parents should talk to children to make children understand good behavior.

Second of all, the passage claims that spanking is more effective than other types of discipline. The passage says that spanking has been shown to be more effective than time-outs. After children are spanked, they are less likely to do the forbidden act again than if they were simply punished by time-out. The lecture says the passage’s claim is incorrect, stating that studies show spanking is no more effective than other discipline. The lecturer further explains that spanking is less effective to children than time-outs, according to studies.

Lastly, the passage states that spanking is an understandable punishment. The lecturer disagrees with the passage’s statement, pointing out that spanking does not teach children not to misbehave. Instead, the lecturer claims that spanking delivers the wrong message, because spanking teaches children violence.

To sum up, the passage says that spanking is a warranted punishment for children. On the other hand, the lecturer says that spanking is actually an unhealthy discipline.

Both the passage and the lecture discuss spanking. While the passage says that spanking is an effective disciplinary tool, the lecture says that spanking is not a good disciplinary method for children.

First of all, the passage states that spanking helps children understand the difference between right and wrong. The passage says that spanking makes children remember which particular forbidden acts they should avoid. The lecture refutes the passage’s statement by saying that spanking does not teach children morality. The lecture also says that parents should talk to children to make children understand good behavior.

Second of all, the passage claims that spanking is more effective than other types of discipline. The passage says that spanking has been shown to be more effective than time-outs. After children are spanked, they are less likely to do the forbidden act again than if they were simply punished by a time-out. The lecture says the passage’s claim is incorrect, stating that studies show spanking is no more effective than other forms discipline. The lecturer further explains that spanking is less effective to children than time-outs, according to studies.

Lastly, the passage states that spanking is an understandable punishment. The lecturer disagrees with the passage’s statement, pointing out that spanking does not teach children not to misbehave. Instead, the lecturer claims that spanking delivers the wrong message, because spanking teaches children violence.

To sum up, the passage says that spanking is a warranted punishment for children. On the other hand, the lecturer says that spanking is actually an unhealthy discipline.

Both the passage and the lecture discuss spanking. While the passage says that spanking is an effective disciplinary tool, the lecture says that spanking is not a good disciplinary method for children.

First of all, the passage states that spanking helps children understand the difference between right and wrong by making children remember which particular forbidden acts they should avoid. The lecture refutes the passage’s statement by saying that spanking does not teach children morality. The lecture also says that parents should talk to children to make children understand good behavior.

Second of all, the passage claims that spanking is more effective than other types of discipline. The passage says that spanking has been shown to be more effective than time-outs. After children are spanked, they are less likely to do the forbidden act again than if they were simply punished by a time-out. The lecture says the passage’s claim is incorrect, stating that studies show spanking is no more effective than other forms discipline. The lecturer further explains that spanking is a less effective method of disciplining children.

Lastly, the passage states that spanking is an understandable punishment. The lecturer disagrees with the passage’s statement, pointing out that spanking does not teach children not to misbehave. Instead, the lecturer claims that spanking delivers the wrong message, because spanking teaches children violence.

To sum up, the passage says that spanking is a warranted punishment for children. On the other hand, the lecturer says that spanking is actually an unhealthy discipline.