COLLEEN's BOARD
글을 올리려면 먼저 로그인해주세요. 회원가입이 필요합니다. 스팸방지에 협조해주셔서 감사합니다.
Q : Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe universities have a gender balance in the number of students. On the other hand, other people believe universities should not have any limit for entrance about gender. I slightly agree that universities should have a gender quota for the entrance.
The reason for a necessity of equality numbers of male and female in universities is against sexual discrimination. Of course there should be equal opportunities in education apart from the sexes. But, a military school in Korea assigns high portions of score for the entrance exams in physical area such as physical training and military training. It becomes big advantages for men because men are better than women biologically. Like this example, the sexual discrimination exists in education, and equality of opportunities in education should be protected by the constitutional law in democratic countries. However people should understand the specialty of military because basically military is for protection our countries from attacking by other countries. In the battle, men are more useful than women. Also it is not discrimination but difference.
Despite equality of opportunity in education is important, the control of numbers of genders in some subjects is a good idea. For instance, a university of education in Korea has number of male quota because there are female teachers more than 90 percent in elementary schools. Although children have to get education from both male and female teachers, now Korean children have to study with only female teachers.
To conclude, if universities restrict on the number of students by gender in every subject, could be reverse discrimination. However, controlling the students of gender rate in some specific subject is needed because of their specialty of the area or necessity of balance for gender rate of the field.
Q : Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe universities should have a gender balance in the number of students. On the other hand, other people believe universities should not have any gender cap. I slightly agree that universities should have a gender quota for the entrance.
The reason for a necessity of equality numbers of male and female in universities is against gender discrimination. Of course there should be equal opportunities in education apart from the sexes. For example, a military school in Korea assigns higher portions of score for the entrance exams in physical area such as physical training and military training. It can become a big advantage for men because men are better than women biologically**. Like this example, the sexual discrimination exists in education, and equality of opportunities in education should be protected by the constitutional law in democratic countries. However people should understand the specialty of military because basically military is for protection our countries from attacking by other countries. In
thebattle, men are more useful than women.AlsoIt is not discrimination but difference.**While grammatically correct, this statement makes it sound like you're sexist. I think you're aiming for "men are better-suited for physical training than women are." or "men are biologically engineered to be better at physical labor."
DespiteEquality of opportunity in education is important, but the balanceof numbersof genders in some subjects is a good idea. For instance, a university of education in Korea has number of male quota because 90 percent of teachers in elementary schools are female. Although children have to** get education from both male and female teachers, now Korean children have to study with only female teachers.**I'm not totally sure what you mean. If it is highly suggested that children obtain education from females and males, then you probably should say "...children should get education..." If there is a rule in Korea where children absolutely must be taught by both males and females, it's fine, but the second part of the sentence doesn't make sense.
To conclude, if universities restrict
onthe number of students by gender in every subject, it would be reverse discrimination. However, controlling the gender rate of students in some specific subject may be needed because of their specialtyof the areaor necessity of balance for gender rate of the field.Key
suggestion / comment
grammatically incorrect